|
In County of Los Angeles v. Lexington National Insurance Corp., 2010 WL 3260412 (Cal.App. August 19, 2010) the defendant obtained a note from his doctor, without mentioning any court appearance. The next day the defendant failed to appear, but the court accepted the note as an excuse and did not forfeit the bond.
More
|
|
In State v. Slider, 2009 WL 2521203 (Ohio App. August 12, 2009) the defendant failed to appear and the trial court revoked the bond, issued a warrant and scheduled a forfeiture hearing. The hearing was held on September 3, 2008, which was 22 days after the court mailed notice of the hearing.
More
|
|
In Casteneda v. State , 2010 WL 3030973 (Tex.App. - San Antonio August 4, 2010) the surety filed an answer to the rule to show cause but did not appear for the hearing.
More
|
|
In People v. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Insurance Co. , 2010 WL 3009588 (Cal.App. August 3, 2010) the defendant fled to Mexico. A few days before expiration of the extended appearance period, the surety learned that the defendant had been arrested in Mexico and confined to a town there. The surety filed a motion to toll the running of the appearance period either because the confinement was a temporary disability pursuant to Penal Code §1305(e) or on equitable grounds.
More
|
|
In United States v. Gonzales & Gonzales Bonds and Insurance Agency, Inc., 2010 WL 2985545 (N.D.Cal. July 27, 2010) the Government sued an agent and surety to collect on certain immigration bonds and the defendants counterclaimed.
More
|
|
In Villasana v. City of Houston , 2010 WL 2991095 (S.D.Tex. July 26, 2010) an attorney who acted as bail bond surety for his clients in the City's Municipal Court filed a purported civil rights action against the City and several of its employees objecting to the City's attempts to compel payment on forfeited bonds that he alleged he had been told would not have to be paid.
More
|
|
|
|
|
